Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorQafisheh, Mutaz-
dc.identifier.citationMutaz Qafisheh, ‘The International Status of National Human Rights Institutions: A Comparison with NGOs’, Nordic Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2013, 55-83.en_US
dc.description.abstractAlthough working at the country level, national human rights institutions (NHIR) do contribute to the international human rights process. In working within the UN human rights system, national institutions are neither an alternative to NGOs or governments. However, such institutions can potentially play a far more influential role than NGOs due to their official character as state bodies. The position of NGOs in relation to the wider UN system, particularly through the Economic and Social Council consultative status, is well established. Due to states’ politics, the UN has not clarified its ties with national institutions as it did with regard to NGOs. However, with regard to the UN human rights system, NHRIs have acquired a status practically comparable, and sometimes even stronger, than that of NGOs. At the formal level and vis-à-vis the UN system generally, however, NHRIs have yet to reach the status that has been gained by NGOs.en_US
dc.publisherUniversity of Osloen_US
dc.subjectNational Institutions, NHRIs, NGOs, Treaty-bodies, Universal Periodic Review, UN Special Procedures, Human Rights Protection, UN Human Rights Systemen_US
dc.titleThe International Status of National Human Rights Institutions: A Comparison with NGOsen_US
Appears in Collections:Journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Abstract--NHRIs Paper.docx13.34 kBMicrosoft Word XMLView/Open

Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.